"Among the Righteous" updated
I just finished watching "Among the Righteous" - it's a very
interesting film, not only telling the stories of some Arabs
who saved Jews in North Africa, but also asking the
question of why this has not been researched and
remembered. These are my notes on the film:
Among the Righteous
More than one hundred concentration camps were set up
in North Africa, by the Vichy French, the Nazis, and the
Italians. A camp in Libya named Giado was where the most
Jews died of all of the camps. An interesting point made by
Satloff is that even though knowledge of these camps had
been forgotten for a long time, the movie Casablanca
(made during the war) mentions concentration camps at a
couple of points, so their existence was certainly known at
the time.
One example of a righteous person whom Satloff found
was an Arab nobleman named Ali Sikkat, in Tunisia. During
fighting in 1943, sixty Jews were being kept in a labor
camp fled the camp in the middle of a battle between the
Allies and the Axis. Their lives were saved by Ali Sikkat,
whose story was published already fifty years ago.
Satloff said that his search for a righteous Arab was
politically loaded: why don’t we know these stories? Arabs
don’t want to be found – it became toxic in many Arab
countries to let it be known that you’d helped Jews. The
problem is that Arab sympathy for the Palestinian people
has prevented these stories from being unearthed and told,
in order not to give support to Israel.
Historically speaking, Jews in Muslim lands lived as second
class citizens (admittedly, usually better than the situation
of Jews living in Christian countries). Jews were under legal
prescriptions (as dhimmis who had to pay the jizya to gain
legal protection), and from time to time there was violence
against them. In the 1930s, the Jews of North Africa faced
a new threat – fascism and antisemitism.
The only Holocaust memorial monument in all of North
Africa commemorates a group of Tunisian Jews who were
deported and killed in Europe – Joseph, Gilbert, Jean
Scemla. Gilbert went to the Ecole Polytechnique (highest
French university), and fought with the French against the
Nazis in 1940.
France’s Vichy government was almost as antisemitic as
the German government. After the fall of France, Gilbert
rejoined his family in Tunis, since he was no longer at home
in France. But North Africa was becoming less hospitable to
Jews – the film shows images of Petain, and the fascist
salute.
The strict quotas of France’s antisemitic laws were
imposed in French North Africa. Jewish businesses were
confiscated, Jews were barred from the professions,
Jewish children were kicked out of schools, and Jews were
stripped of their citizenship.
The Vichy government established harsh internment camps
in Algeria and Morocco, in the Sahara. The
Jewish prisoners were mostly from central Europe, people
who had fled to North Africa from the Nazis in Europe.
Satloff relays testimonies from Polish Jewish survivors who
were liberated by the British. One of the tasks laid upon the
prisoners was to build the trans-Sahara railway. A couple
of the camps in Morocco were in Bergen and Tendrara,
where people died of starvation, insects, exposure, and
illness.
In beginning of 1942, Rommel (general of the Afrika Korps)
entered Egypt. Hitler ordered him to hold North Africa.
Operation Torch, the beginning of the Allied
counteroffensive against the Nazis, landed American and
British troops in North Africa. The video shows the war
cemetery in Tunis, with the graves of 6,000 American
troops (I never knew this).
German troops invaded Tunisia - it was the only Arab
country to be occupied by the Nazis. Once the Germans
entered Tunisia, they began the usual routine of
persecuting the Jews. The SS commander in Tunis was
Walter Rauf, the Nazi commander who had been involved
in organizing the mobile gas killing vans in eastern Europe.
In December, 1942, Rauf rounded up Jews in Tunis. Jewish
laborers were forced to wear the yellow star.
How did Arabs react to the persecution of their Jewish
neighbors? Most were bystanders, a few made their hatred
heard – “you Jews, you Yids, will all have your throats cut.”
Some Arabs enlisted in the German army, others
volunteered to guard the camps, and a few rescued Jews
from Nazi persecution.
Joseph Naccache said that his neighbors had shielded him.
Satloff found his house and the hammam (bathhouse)
where he had been protected. Why did they protect the
Jews? Because Jews and Muslims were like brothers
(speaking to the son of the man who protected
Naccacche).
Satloff showed the marble mausoleum of King Mohammed
V of Morocco, who was king during WWII. He defied the
Vichy authorities and said that in his kingdom there were
no Jews or Muslims – only Moroccan citizens. The Vichy
authorities wanted Moroccan Jews to wear the yellow star,
but the king refused, saying that he too would wear the
yellow star. In Algeria there were Muslim religious
objections to Vichy laws against the Jews. An
announcement was made in the mosques forbidding any
Muslim believer from serving as a custodian of confiscated
Jewish property. The newly crowned king of Tunisia under
Nazi rule told the Jews he thought of them as part of his
family.
To return to the Scemla family. They moved to the seaside
town of Hammamat. Gilbert and Jean decided to fight with
the French resistance. They then tried to escape, with the
help of Hassan Vergany, who was a friend of the family.
Vergany turned them into the Germans, and they were
arrested outside of the German headquarters of Rommel
himself. Joseph Scemla and his two sons were sent to the
old Turkish prison in Tunis. In April 1943 they were sent to
Dachau in Germany with 50 other prisoners.
It was a year before the Germans decided on their fate.
Satloff then recounted the story of Khaled Abdul Wahad,
who owned a farm in Tunisia. Annie Bouqris told of this
Arab landowner who saved her life and the life of her
family. His daughter is still alive, and she said that at that
time she knew that there were some Jewish families on
the farm.
Edmee Masliah was told that her family’s home was being
taken by the Nazis. Her family took refuge in an
abandoned olive oil factory along with other Jewish
families. Khaled wined and dined the German soldiers and
learned that one of them had his eye on a Jewish girl.
Khaled went to the oil press factory and told the Jews they
had to leave immediately, and he led them to his farm,
where they stayed in the stables. This should have been a
perfect hiding place for the Jews, but soon after they
arrived, a German regiment pitched its tents right on the
edge of his property. Khaled told them not to wear their
Jewish stars, so no one would know they were Jewish.
One night when the men were away doing forced labor,
the women and children almost came to grief. Khaled was
still entertaining Germans to keep informed; a drunken
German wandered off into the Bouqris family’s bedroom
and threatened to rape one of the girls. He told them he
was going to kill them that night. At that moment Khaled
showed up and led away the German from the Jews.
That spring the German army was caught in a pincer
between the British and American armies. Hundreds of
thousands of German soldiers were captured. The ordeal
of North African Jews was almost over. Satloff showed a
film clip of Jews in Tunisia taking off the yellow stars.
To return to Joseph Scemla and his sons: they were
transferred to the prison at Halle, Germany, and all were
condemned to death. (Vergany was also condemned to 14
years in jail when the Free French took over Tunisia after
the defeat of the Germans in 1943).
When Satloff lectures in Arab countries about the
Holocaust, some Arabs yell at him, and say why are we
talking about the Holocaust of 60 years ago instead of the
Holocaust of the Palestinian Arabs today (he shows a clip
of man who left his lecture yelling at him). A Palestinian
Arab woman says we can now make a choice for peace,
but many Arabs don’t want to recognize the Holocaust out
of the fear that it means the acceptance of Israel.
In Israel – Satloff asks why haven’t we looked for Arab
rescuers? He presents more stories from Tunisian
survivors – about how they were saved from Germans by
Arab neighbors. Satloff is trying to get Khaled Abdul Wahad
recognized as one of the Righteous – but Yad Vashem has
refused, out of doubt that he risked his life for Jews (which
is required to declare someone a Righteous Gentile).
Thursday, April 14, 2011
"Among the Righteous" updated
Volcano in Iceland -Natural Accidents
The Fimmvoruhald volcano erupting at Iceland's
Eyjafjallajökull glacier, earlier this week. (Don't ask me to
pronounce either name - when I listen to Eyjafjallajökull
being pronounced via Slate or Wikipedia, it sounds very
little like what it looks like).
I was living in Seattle in 1980 when Mount St. Helens blew
(see the website for the Mount St. Helens National Volcano
Monument for more information).
The winds never blew the ash cloud into Seattle, but
Portland was hit several times by the ash when the wind
blew in the right direction. It was still very dramatic - you
could see the huge column of ash for a long time from
Seattle. I never did visit the volcano, but one of the tourist
souvenirs one could buy soon afterwards were little glass
vials of volcano ash. I bought one but have no idea what
happened to it.
Eyjafjallajökull glacier, earlier this week. (Don't ask me to
pronounce either name - when I listen to Eyjafjallajökull
being pronounced via Slate or Wikipedia, it sounds very
little like what it looks like).
I was living in Seattle in 1980 when Mount St. Helens blew
(see the website for the Mount St. Helens National Volcano
Monument for more information).
The winds never blew the ash cloud into Seattle, but
Portland was hit several times by the ash when the wind
blew in the right direction. It was still very dramatic - you
could see the huge column of ash for a long time from
Seattle. I never did visit the volcano, but one of the tourist
souvenirs one could buy soon afterwards were little glass
vials of volcano ash. I bought one but have no idea what
happened to it.
Human Rights Watch - Obsession with Israel
The Sunday Times (London) has just published an article
on Human Rights Watch's most controversial
ex-employee, Marc Garlasco (whose hobby was collecting
Nazi memorabilia). The article also nails HRW on their
obsession with Israel/Palestine above other conflict zones
in the world.
Every year, Human Rights Watch puts out up to 100
glossy reports — essentially mini books — and 600-700
press releases, according to Daly, a former journalist for
The Independent.
Some conflict zones get much more coverage than others.
For instance, HRW has published five heavily publicised
reports on Israel and the Palestinian territories since the
January 2009 war.
In 20 years they have published only four reports on the
conflict in Indian-controlled Kashmir, for example, even
though the conflict has taken at least 80,000 lives in these
two decades, and torture and extrajudicial murder have
taken place on a vast scale. Perhaps even more tellingly,
HRW has not published any report on the postelection
violence and repression in Iran more than six months after
the event.
When I asked the Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson
if HRW was ever going to release one, she said: “We have
a draft, but I’m not sure I want to put one out.” Asked the
same question, executive director Kenneth Roth told me
that the problem with doing a report on Iran was the
difficulty of getting into the country.
I interviewed a human-rights expert at a competing
organisation in Washington who did not wish to be named
because “we operate in a very small world and t’s not
done to criticise other human-rights organisations”. He told
me he was “not surprised” that HRW has still not produced
a report on the violence in Iran: “They are thinking about
how it’s going to be used politically in Washington. And it’s
not a priority for them because Iran is just not a bad guy
that they are interested in highlighting. Their hearts are not
in it. Let’s face it, the thing that really excites them is
Israel.”
Noah Pollak, a New York writer who has led some of the
criticisms against HRW, points out that it cares about
Palestinians when maltreated by Israelis, but is less
concerned if perpetrators are fellow Arabs. For instance, in
2007 the Lebanese army shelled the Nahr al Bared refugee
camp near Tripoli (then under the control of Fatah al Islam
radicals), killing more than 100 civilians and displacing
30,000. HRW put out a press release — but it never
produced a report.
Such imbalance was at the heart of a public dressing-down
that shook HRW in October. It came from the
organisation’s own founder and chairman emeritus, the
renowned publisher Robert Bernstein, who took it to task
in The New York Times for devoting its resources to open
and democratic societies rather than closed ones.
(Originally set up as Helsinki Watch, the group’s original
brief was to expose abuses of human rights behind the iron
curtain.)
“Nowhere is this more evident than its work in the Middle
East,” he wrote. “The region is populated by authoritarian
regimes with appalling human-rights records. Yet in recent
years Human Rights Watch has written far more
condemnations of Israel… than of any other country in the
region.”
Bernstein pointed out that Israel has “a population of
7.4m, is home to at least 80 human-rights organisations, a
vibrant free press, a democratically elected government, a
judiciary that frequently rules against the government…and
probably more journalists per capita than any other
country in the world… Meanwhile the Arab and Iranian
regimes rule over some 350m people and most remain
brutal, closed and autocratic”.
Bernstein concluded that if HRW did not “return to its
founding mission and the spirit of humility that animated it…
its credibility will be seriously undermined and its important
role in the world significantly diminished”. HRW’s response
was ferocious — and disingenuous. In their letters to the
paper, Roth and others made it sound as if Bernstein had
said that open societies and democracies should not be
monitored at all.
It turns out that even Garlasco was not as enthused about
the anti-Israel line of HRW as his bosses in New York
wanted him to be:
Associates of Garlasco have told me that there had long
been tensions between Garlasco and HRW’s Middle East
Division in New York — perhaps because he sometimes
stuck his neck out and did not follow the HRW line.
Garlasco himself apparently resented what he felt was
pressure to sex up claims of Israeli violations of laws of
war in Gaza and Lebanon, or to stick by initial assessments
even when they turned out to be incorrect.
In June 2006, Garlasco had alleged that an explosion on a
Gaza beach that killed seven people had been caused by
Israeli shelling. However, after seeing the details of an
Israeli army investigation that closely examined the
relevant ballistics and blast patterns, he subsequently told
the Jerusalem Post that he had been wrong and that the
deaths were probably caused by an unexploded munition in
the sand. But this went down badly at Human Rights Watch
HQ in New York, and the admission was retracted by an
HRW press release the next day.
Emphasis mine.
on Human Rights Watch's most controversial
ex-employee, Marc Garlasco (whose hobby was collecting
Nazi memorabilia). The article also nails HRW on their
obsession with Israel/Palestine above other conflict zones
in the world.
Every year, Human Rights Watch puts out up to 100
glossy reports — essentially mini books — and 600-700
press releases, according to Daly, a former journalist for
The Independent.
Some conflict zones get much more coverage than others.
For instance, HRW has published five heavily publicised
reports on Israel and the Palestinian territories since the
January 2009 war.
In 20 years they have published only four reports on the
conflict in Indian-controlled Kashmir, for example, even
though the conflict has taken at least 80,000 lives in these
two decades, and torture and extrajudicial murder have
taken place on a vast scale. Perhaps even more tellingly,
HRW has not published any report on the postelection
violence and repression in Iran more than six months after
the event.
When I asked the Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson
if HRW was ever going to release one, she said: “We have
a draft, but I’m not sure I want to put one out.” Asked the
same question, executive director Kenneth Roth told me
that the problem with doing a report on Iran was the
difficulty of getting into the country.
I interviewed a human-rights expert at a competing
organisation in Washington who did not wish to be named
because “we operate in a very small world and t’s not
done to criticise other human-rights organisations”. He told
me he was “not surprised” that HRW has still not produced
a report on the violence in Iran: “They are thinking about
how it’s going to be used politically in Washington. And it’s
not a priority for them because Iran is just not a bad guy
that they are interested in highlighting. Their hearts are not
in it. Let’s face it, the thing that really excites them is
Israel.”
Noah Pollak, a New York writer who has led some of the
criticisms against HRW, points out that it cares about
Palestinians when maltreated by Israelis, but is less
concerned if perpetrators are fellow Arabs. For instance, in
2007 the Lebanese army shelled the Nahr al Bared refugee
camp near Tripoli (then under the control of Fatah al Islam
radicals), killing more than 100 civilians and displacing
30,000. HRW put out a press release — but it never
produced a report.
Such imbalance was at the heart of a public dressing-down
that shook HRW in October. It came from the
organisation’s own founder and chairman emeritus, the
renowned publisher Robert Bernstein, who took it to task
in The New York Times for devoting its resources to open
and democratic societies rather than closed ones.
(Originally set up as Helsinki Watch, the group’s original
brief was to expose abuses of human rights behind the iron
curtain.)
“Nowhere is this more evident than its work in the Middle
East,” he wrote. “The region is populated by authoritarian
regimes with appalling human-rights records. Yet in recent
years Human Rights Watch has written far more
condemnations of Israel… than of any other country in the
region.”
Bernstein pointed out that Israel has “a population of
7.4m, is home to at least 80 human-rights organisations, a
vibrant free press, a democratically elected government, a
judiciary that frequently rules against the government…and
probably more journalists per capita than any other
country in the world… Meanwhile the Arab and Iranian
regimes rule over some 350m people and most remain
brutal, closed and autocratic”.
Bernstein concluded that if HRW did not “return to its
founding mission and the spirit of humility that animated it…
its credibility will be seriously undermined and its important
role in the world significantly diminished”. HRW’s response
was ferocious — and disingenuous. In their letters to the
paper, Roth and others made it sound as if Bernstein had
said that open societies and democracies should not be
monitored at all.
It turns out that even Garlasco was not as enthused about
the anti-Israel line of HRW as his bosses in New York
wanted him to be:
Associates of Garlasco have told me that there had long
been tensions between Garlasco and HRW’s Middle East
Division in New York — perhaps because he sometimes
stuck his neck out and did not follow the HRW line.
Garlasco himself apparently resented what he felt was
pressure to sex up claims of Israeli violations of laws of
war in Gaza and Lebanon, or to stick by initial assessments
even when they turned out to be incorrect.
In June 2006, Garlasco had alleged that an explosion on a
Gaza beach that killed seven people had been caused by
Israeli shelling. However, after seeing the details of an
Israeli army investigation that closely examined the
relevant ballistics and blast patterns, he subsequently told
the Jerusalem Post that he had been wrong and that the
deaths were probably caused by an unexploded munition in
the sand. But this went down badly at Human Rights Watch
HQ in New York, and the admission was retracted by an
HRW press release the next day.
Emphasis mine.
New York Times, June 10, 1945 - Estimate of number of Jews murdered
The New York Times reported on June 10, 1945, about the
number of Jews killed by the Nazis. Since this is such an
early report, some of the information in this article was
later known to be inaccurate, but this is the first version of
what happened to the Jews of Europe under the Nazis.
80% OF REICH JEWS MURDERED BY NAZIS
All Those Left in Europe were Marked for Death by 1946,
AMG [Allied Military Government] Investigation Shows
Only 150,000 Survied
Extermination Plan Revealed - Russians Estimate Several
Million Died in East
FRANKFURT ON MAIN, Germany, June 8 (Delayed) (U.P.) -
The Nazis exterminated at least 80 percent of Germany's
Jews, and every remaining Jew in occupied Europe was
marked for murder before the summer of 1946, it was
revealed today.
It now is possible to give the full story of the Nazis' plan to
wipe out all of Europe's 12,000,000 Jews. Allied Military
Government authorities, after a painstaking study,
reported that a majority of the Jews in Germany met
death between 1939 and 1942. Russian officials estimate
several million Jews were exterminated at concentration
camps in Poland and White Russia during the German
occupation.
On the basis of this information, it is believed that less than
20 percent, or about 150,000 of the original group in the
Reich, survived the reign of terror. These survivors are
being returned to their homes as soon as possible.
Germans who dispossessed them are being ousted. In
most cases, this is done without serious friction, despite
the years of intensive anti-Semitic propaganda.
Synagogues Reopened
In several cities, including Aachen, Cologne, and Frankfort
on Main, synagogues have been reopened and Jewish
services conducted for the first time since November,
1938.
Some homeless Jews are cared for by the United Nations
Relief and Rehabilitation Administration. Included are 500
Jewish children, mostly between the ages of 15 and 17,
but some as young as 10. They were rescued from the
Buchenwald camp and now are at Thionville in Lorraine, in
the French zone.
The Nazis' master plan was engineered by Dr. Alfred
Rosenberg, reportedly an Allied prisoner. He was aided by
Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and Gestapo Chief
Heinrich Himmler. The plan originally called for a "Jew-free
Reich" by April 1, 1942, as a birthday present to Adolf
Hitler, but it was slowed down by transportation difficulties.
Its first stage began after Poland fell in 1939. Jews were to
be used as slave laborers in war factories built in that
country. They were to die gradually of starvation, disease
and cold. The first contingent of Jews from Germany was
rounded up in Stettin, Cologne and Frankfort on Main -
about 50,000 in all. They were shipped to Lublin in October
and November, 1939. Transportation trouble set in and
only a few thousand were deported eastward during the
next two years.
Few left unmolested
The drive began in earnest in September, 1941. It
continued full blast until scarcely a Jew was left unmolested
in Germany or any occupied country. In Berlin the Nazis
began in 1941 to deport bout 20,000 persons eastward
each month. They were stripped, searched, robed and then
packed in trucks and rail cars. Some worked in airplane and
textile plants. Others were thrown into ghettos. Thousands
went straight to extermination camps.
Relatives and friends in the Reich seldom if ever heard of
them again. More than once the trains were stopped and
all Jews were ordered out and massacred.
The third stage of the program was launched early in 1943,
well after the original deadline for the whole plan. The Nazis
rounded up and deported Jews from France, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Hungary, Romania, and Yugoslavia. Some
were sent to Poland and others to concentration camps in
Germany. Tens of thousands were killed monthly in these
camps. The Nazis in 1943 began emptying the ghettos of
Warsaw, Riga, Lublin and other large cities, and started
systematic extermination by gas.
UNRRA officials expressed the belief that if the war had
lasted another year, the Nazis might have come very close
to their objective of wiping out all Jews in Europe.
Starvation Still Reported
The Vaad Hatzala Emergency Committee, with
headquarters at 32 Nassau Street, disclosed yesterday
that Jewish survivors of Nazi horror camps, freed but
temporarily residing there until they can be repatriated or
emigrated, "are living under conditions bordering upon
starvation." The committee said that it had received word
of the plight of the Jewish survivors from Isaac Sternbuch,
its representative in Switzerland, who made a cabled plea
for relief funds.
Mr. Sternbuch said all available food stocks purchased
abroad with Vaad Hatzala funds already had been
dispatched on International Red Cross trucks to
concentration camps at Landsberg, Dachau, Mauthausen
and Theresienstadt.
number of Jews killed by the Nazis. Since this is such an
early report, some of the information in this article was
later known to be inaccurate, but this is the first version of
what happened to the Jews of Europe under the Nazis.
80% OF REICH JEWS MURDERED BY NAZIS
All Those Left in Europe were Marked for Death by 1946,
AMG [Allied Military Government] Investigation Shows
Only 150,000 Survied
Extermination Plan Revealed - Russians Estimate Several
Million Died in East
FRANKFURT ON MAIN, Germany, June 8 (Delayed) (U.P.) -
The Nazis exterminated at least 80 percent of Germany's
Jews, and every remaining Jew in occupied Europe was
marked for murder before the summer of 1946, it was
revealed today.
It now is possible to give the full story of the Nazis' plan to
wipe out all of Europe's 12,000,000 Jews. Allied Military
Government authorities, after a painstaking study,
reported that a majority of the Jews in Germany met
death between 1939 and 1942. Russian officials estimate
several million Jews were exterminated at concentration
camps in Poland and White Russia during the German
occupation.
On the basis of this information, it is believed that less than
20 percent, or about 150,000 of the original group in the
Reich, survived the reign of terror. These survivors are
being returned to their homes as soon as possible.
Germans who dispossessed them are being ousted. In
most cases, this is done without serious friction, despite
the years of intensive anti-Semitic propaganda.
Synagogues Reopened
In several cities, including Aachen, Cologne, and Frankfort
on Main, synagogues have been reopened and Jewish
services conducted for the first time since November,
1938.
Some homeless Jews are cared for by the United Nations
Relief and Rehabilitation Administration. Included are 500
Jewish children, mostly between the ages of 15 and 17,
but some as young as 10. They were rescued from the
Buchenwald camp and now are at Thionville in Lorraine, in
the French zone.
The Nazis' master plan was engineered by Dr. Alfred
Rosenberg, reportedly an Allied prisoner. He was aided by
Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and Gestapo Chief
Heinrich Himmler. The plan originally called for a "Jew-free
Reich" by April 1, 1942, as a birthday present to Adolf
Hitler, but it was slowed down by transportation difficulties.
Its first stage began after Poland fell in 1939. Jews were to
be used as slave laborers in war factories built in that
country. They were to die gradually of starvation, disease
and cold. The first contingent of Jews from Germany was
rounded up in Stettin, Cologne and Frankfort on Main -
about 50,000 in all. They were shipped to Lublin in October
and November, 1939. Transportation trouble set in and
only a few thousand were deported eastward during the
next two years.
Few left unmolested
The drive began in earnest in September, 1941. It
continued full blast until scarcely a Jew was left unmolested
in Germany or any occupied country. In Berlin the Nazis
began in 1941 to deport bout 20,000 persons eastward
each month. They were stripped, searched, robed and then
packed in trucks and rail cars. Some worked in airplane and
textile plants. Others were thrown into ghettos. Thousands
went straight to extermination camps.
Relatives and friends in the Reich seldom if ever heard of
them again. More than once the trains were stopped and
all Jews were ordered out and massacred.
The third stage of the program was launched early in 1943,
well after the original deadline for the whole plan. The Nazis
rounded up and deported Jews from France, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Hungary, Romania, and Yugoslavia. Some
were sent to Poland and others to concentration camps in
Germany. Tens of thousands were killed monthly in these
camps. The Nazis in 1943 began emptying the ghettos of
Warsaw, Riga, Lublin and other large cities, and started
systematic extermination by gas.
UNRRA officials expressed the belief that if the war had
lasted another year, the Nazis might have come very close
to their objective of wiping out all Jews in Europe.
Starvation Still Reported
The Vaad Hatzala Emergency Committee, with
headquarters at 32 Nassau Street, disclosed yesterday
that Jewish survivors of Nazi horror camps, freed but
temporarily residing there until they can be repatriated or
emigrated, "are living under conditions bordering upon
starvation." The committee said that it had received word
of the plight of the Jewish survivors from Isaac Sternbuch,
its representative in Switzerland, who made a cabled plea
for relief funds.
Mr. Sternbuch said all available food stocks purchased
abroad with Vaad Hatzala funds already had been
dispatched on International Red Cross trucks to
concentration camps at Landsberg, Dachau, Mauthausen
and Theresienstadt.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)